What is the official website of the payment service?
www.ukash.com
www.ukash.com
Contact details were on the “Contact Us” page of the official website; service ended so details are no longer provided.
Ukash’s dedicated support numbers are no longer active due to the service closure.
Ukash did not maintain an active toll-free support number after its services were discontinued.
No active technical support email exists, as Ukash’s services have closed.
Ukash previously offered different emails, but these contacts are now inactive.
Online chat support was accessible via the website; it is no longer available due to the service shutdown.
24/7 chat support was not available; live chat was limited and ended with the service termination.
Messenger support was not provided by Ukash, and no such channels exist post-closure.
Support hours were region-dependent but are obsolete since the service was discontinued.
Weekend and holiday support was offered in some regions but has ceased with the shutdown.
Ukash had offices in the UK and other regions but these no longer accept visitors.
Main office was in London, United Kingdom; locations have ceased to operate.
Personal meetings for service inquiries are no longer possible, as the company ceased all operations.
Regional representatives operated globally before closure; no active offices remain.
Support was offered primarily in English and other European languages, but is no longer available.
Response times varied before closure; all support channels are now inactive.
Ukash did not publicly state a VIP priority system, and no such service now exists.
Callback requests are no longer possible as the service and its support channels have ended.
Ukash was founded in 2005, in the United Kingdom.
Ukash was founded by Justin Basini; it was owned by Smart Voucher Ltd and was later acquired by Paysafe Group.
Ukash was registered in the United Kingdom.
Ukash launched in 2005, expanded globally as a leading prepaid voucher system, and was acquired by Paysafe Group in 2014. Paysafe merged its voucher services, discontinuing Ukash in 2015.
Major change was acquisition by Paysafe Group and integration with paysafecard in 2015; this ended Ukash-branded services.
Company ceased operations; board of directors information is not publicly maintained.
Smart Voucher Ltd and later Paysafe Group were main stakeholders; no current investment as the brand has ended.
Paysafe Group, the acquiring company, was publicly listed; Ukash itself was not.
Ukash no longer exists as an independent entity, so market capitalization is not available.
Subsidiary and branch structure was dissolved after the Paysafe merger.
Ukash was regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK under Smart Voucher Ltd before discontinuation.
Ukash operated in the UK, Europe, and internationally before its closure in 2015.
Ukash did not offer cryptocurrency-specific services or possess related licenses.
Ukash adhered to AML and KYC standards regulated by the FCA before its closure.
Ukash maintained payment security standards including PCI DSS compliance during operation.
Regular security audits were performed in compliance with UK regulatory standards when operational.
Client funds were protected per FCA guidelines; coverage ended with the termination of the service.
Ukash followed PCI DSS, AML, and e-money compliance standards in the markets it served.
No widely reported major regulatory fines or violations were issued against Ukash publically.
Historical user reviews may be found on Trustpilot, finance forums, and archived consumer review sites.
Common complaints included voucher acceptance issues, refund delays, and regional restrictions, especially near its closure.
Users appreciated easy cash payments, wide retail accessibility, and anonymity compared to card payments.
Withdrawal issues included delays and voucher non-redemption incidents, especially during transition to Paysafe.
Ukash interface was considered basic; user feedback on usability was generally positive, but outdated near closure.
Transactions were typically instant, apart from issues close to the end of service.
Recommendation rates dropped with closure and discontinuation, but Ukash was popular during peak operation.
Experts previously rated Ukash as a secure, convenient prepaid cash solution, noting good regulatory compliance before its end.
Ukash received industry awards including a Queen’s Award for Enterprise in International Trade.
Ukash was ranked among Europe’s innovative payment methods prior to its acquisition by Paysafe.
No specific regulatory recommendations documented; service was FCA-approved while active.
Ukash was considered reliable by merchants and partners, especially in online gaming and digital commerce.
Ukash was acknowledged for its innovative prepaid voucher system and broad cash digitization strategy.
Ukash held PCI DSS and FCA authorizations for quality service before discontinuation.
Ukash representatives participated in payment and fintech industry events before its closure.
Ukash positioned itself as a secure, anonymous cash-to-online-voucher alternative for unbanked and privacy-focused consumers.
Ukash vouchers were available in GBP, EUR, USD, and other region-specific currencies.
Ukash did not support cryptocurrency operations or provide crypto exchange services.
Ukash did not offer a proprietary token or cryptocurrency.
Ukash did not provide currency conversion within its voucher ecosystem; conversion required external action.
Ukash did not offer in-platform conversion; exchange rates were not part of the service.
As conversion was not supported, exchange rates were not updated within Ukash.
Ukash did not support stablecoins or digital currencies.
Only major local currencies were supported through vouchers; exotic currencies were not available.
Voucher issuance was subject to regional regulatory approval, limiting some currencies geographically.
Ukash allowed voucher purchases, online redemption, and payments to participating merchants; bank and card transfers were not directly supported.
Peer transfers were not natively supported; vouchers could only be used for payments to merchants.
Ukash did not support direct voucher redemption to bank cards.
Bank account transfers were not facilitated by Ukash; vouchers were strictly for merchant payment and online redemption.
Bill payment was supported via select partners, but not as an integrated native feature.
Recurring payments were not a core feature; payments were one-off using vouchers.
Automatic transfer and payment scheduling were not supported.
Payment scheduling was not available within Ukash’s platform features.
Group payments and splitting features were not provided.
Payment links were not a native feature; users redeemed using voucher codes on partner sites.
Minimum voucher amounts depended on region but typically started from £10 or local equivalent.
Maximum voucher value was subject to regional caps, generally up to £200 per voucher.
Daily purchase and redemption limits were applied based on regulatory requirements and user verification.
Monthly and annual limits varied by jurisdiction and compliance level, usually aligned with AML/KYC regulations.
Limit increases required higher AML/KYC verification and approval by the operator, as per regulatory standards.
Verified users could access higher transaction and voucher limits compared to unverified ones.
New accounts typically had lower limits pending verification and were subject to regulatory region controls.
Country-specific limits were in place aligning with local e-money regulations.
Temporary blocks could apply in cases of security checks, suspected fraud, or regulatory requirements.
Frequency caps were applied per region and compliance to prevent misuse and fraud.
Voucher purchases typically required a minimum funding amount, often £10 or local equivalent.
Funding was via cash payments at retail outlets, local stores, and partner websites.
Some outlets and partners charged a service fee on voucher purchase, dependent on region.
Minimum funding matched voucher minimums, generally £10 or equivalent at retail.
Ukash vouchers were activated immediately upon purchase and payment.
Ukash did not support direct withdrawals; vouchers were redeemable on merchant websites only.
No withdrawal fees applied as cash-out was unsupported.
Withdrawal was not supported, so no duration applied.
Withdrawal was not possible; limits applied only to voucher purchase and use.
Ukash did not accept card payments for voucher funding; physical cash was required.
Ukash did not offer bank transfer funding or withdrawal options.
Cryptocurrency transfers were not supported.
Peer-to-peer transfer was not available; voucher redemption was instant for purchases.
Delays could occur at retail outlets depending on opening times, but voucher issuance was otherwise instant.
Funding might be delayed at physical outlets that closed during holidays.
Express processing was not relevant as voucher issuance was instant.
Funding speed depended on retail outlet operational hours and immediate payment.
Users received confirmation receipts after voucher purchase; digital notifications were not common.
Users were advised to contact the issuing retail outlet or partner for assistance with delayed voucher activation.
Withdrawals were not an available function with Ukash.
Card withdrawals were not supported.
Bank transfers were not supported.
Cryptocurrency withdrawals were not part of the service.
Withdrawals did not apply for Ukash.
Not applicable, as withdrawals were not offered.
No withdrawal options were available, so acceleration was not relevant.
Withdrawal was not possible with Ukash service.
Withdrawal status notifications were not applicable.
No withdrawal functions were present; cancellation procedures did not exist.
Ukash did not require user registration; vouchers were purchased anonymously at retail locations.
Account creation was not required for basic voucher use; only merchant account setup had data needs.
No registration was needed for voucher purchase; email was required for select merchant accounts only.
Phone verification was not used for voucher purchase; some merchant sites required phone confirmation.
Cash voucher purchases were subject to local laws, generally restricting purchase to adults 18+.
Merchant accounts could be established with Ukash for businesses before closure; details are obsolete.
Real data required only where registration with partner merchants or for business accounts was involved.
Service availability depended on local regulations; not all countries supported Ukash.
Accounts for merchants activated after review, typically in a few business days; no user account activation required.
Verification applied to merchant onboarding and partner integrations; not for voucher buyers.
Merchants and partners provided identity, business registration, and financial documents for onboarding.
Full verification required advanced compliance documents for business accounts and high-value merchant transactions.
Digital document submission was accepted during merchant onboarding.
Merchant review and verification usually took several business days depending on compliance.
Vouchers could be purchased and used anonymously without verification.
Unverified retail users could not exceed local AML transaction limits or access merchant/partnership privileges.
Address confirmation was only needed for merchant accounts.
Not required for voucher users; merchant verification could involve enhanced identity verification depending on region.
Merchant accounts required periodic updates per regulatory guidelines.
Ukash used SSL encryption and PCI DSS standards for transaction and data protection during operation.
Two-factor authentication was not required for voucher use; partner merchants may have offered 2FA.
SMS confirmations were not standard for voucher transactions; partner websites may have implemented them.
Biometric authentication was not available for Ukash voucher use.
Blockchain was not implemented or used in Ukash operations.
The platform implemented multi-layered security across web, payment, and merchant account integrations.
Data protection was governed by UK and EU data privacy laws; minimal personal data was collected.
Cryptocurrencies were not part of Ukash’s product offerings.
Ukash maintained DDoS protection for merchant backend infrastructure.
Regular PCI DSS and regulatory security audits took place before cessation.
Anti-phishing protection included secure website validation and regular communications.
Fraud monitoring for voucher redemption and merchant onboarding was implemented.
Ukash applied AML policies for merchants and regional requirements for voucher redemption.
Suspicious merchant accounts were subject to suspension or investigation per compliance.
Users were to report fraud to Ukash or merchant partners for review and further action.
Reporting was available by contacting customer service on the website or through authorized partners.
Compensation was evaluated case-by-case under FCA guidelines when Ukash was operational.
Dispute resolution was available for merchant and payment issues via customer service.
Blocked merchant accounts could appeal by contacting support and undergoing review.
Cyber insurance was held by the corporate entity per UK regulatory requirements.
Ukash did not charge direct transfer fees; fees applied on voucher purchase at partnered outlets.
Voucher purchase at retail locations could include service fees.
Withdrawal not supported; no withdrawal fees applied.
Currency conversion was not offered; therefore, no fees applied.
No inactivity fees for voucher use.
No maintenance fees for individual voucher use.
Voucher transactions were non-reversible; no cancellation fees applied.
Expedited services were not relevant as voucher issuance was instant.
Fees were transparently displayed at purchase points; hidden fees were not industry standard.
Service fees for large voucher purchases were proportional to value, subject to local regulatory limits.
No formal tariff plans for users; merchant service agreements had customized rates.
VIP or premium status was not a part of Ukash’s user services.
Only merchant partners negotiated special conditions; no such options for standard users.
No free monthly operation quotas due to voucher purchase nature.
Discounts and promotional offers were rare; mainly applied during special campaigns.
Corporate (merchant) rates were customized per agreement for business integration.
Individual user conditions were not offered; customization applied only for business partners.
Promo codes for reduced or bonus voucher value were occasionally distributed during campaigns.
Cashback programs were not part of the standard user offering.
Discounting for volume was occasionally available to merchants.
Ukash did not publish an official mobile app before closing.
Not applicable; no official app was released for any platform.
Not applicable, as no official Ukash app existed.
Service was only accessible via retail and web; no app for comparison.
Biometric login was not supported due to the lack of a mobile app.
Not applicable; no official application existed.
Push notifications were not part of Ukash’s offering.
Dark mode did not exist for the service’s web or mobile interfaces.
Not applicable; no mobile application to update.
Ukash did not run a beta program for a mobile app.
The website was basic, focused on information and voucher redemption; ease of use was rated average.
Web design was responsive before closure, though modern standards were only partially met.
Primary language was English; some regional sites offered local language support.
Night mode was not available.
Hotkey support was not a feature of Ukash’s web interface.
Data export was possible for merchant partners; no user data export for retail voucher buyers.
APIs existed for merchant integration prior to closure; no public user API available.
Integration for payment processing was provided for merchants; public integrations were limited.
Updates took place periodically, but ceased after 2015 service shutdown.
Virtual cards were not issued; vouchers functioned as prepaid codes.
Not supported; one-time-use voucher codes were used instead of disposable cards.
Not supported; vouchers were issued in currency of purchase location.
Investment or savings products were not part of Ukash’s service offering.
No interest earning on voucher balances.
Credit and lending were not available via Ukash.
Peer-to-peer trading was not facilitated on Ukash’s platform.
Cryptocurrency purchase and sale was not provided.
Merchant acquiring was supported; businesses could integrate Ukash payments pre-closure.
Mass payout capabilities for businesses were available via partnerships.
Loyalty programs were not offered for voucher buyers.
Bonus points system was not implemented.
Cashback was not provided by Ukash.
Referral programs were not promoted with the service.
VIP privileges were not offered for voucher buyers.
Seasonal promotions were run occasionally at partner retail and merchant sites.
Premium status was not part of the offering.
Partner-specific discounts were available through special campaigns and merchant promotions.
Corporate loyalty programs were not part of Ukash’s business model.
Ukash was widely accepted for deposits at online casinos.
Standard regulatory restrictions applied; some regions limited gambling-related voucher use.
Payment voucher accounts could not be blocked, but merchant accounts faced restrictions for compliance.
Ukash facilitated legal gambling payments according to local regulations.
Special terms depended on local regulations and merchant agreements.
Casino transactions were tracked via voucher redemption records.
Transaction privacy was limited to voucher anonymity; merchant sites kept redemption records.
Notifications were not provided; tracking relied on merchant systems.
Standard voucher redemption applied; additional fees depended on casino policy.
Limits depended on voucher purchase rules and merchant/casino settings.
Self-exclusion tools were not part of Ukash; casinos may have offered their own.
Ukash did not control access; restrictions depended on region and merchant policies.
Expense controls were not implemented by Ukash directly.
Limit alerts were not included; casinos may provide own limit tracking.
Only casinos could block transactions; Ukash did not block voucher redemption.
Expense statistics were not tracked by Ukash; casino account could offer reporting.
Ukash did not offer this; casinos managed cooling-off and self-exclusion programs.
Guidance was possible through partnered casinos but not directly from Ukash.
No record of direct partnership; casinos may provide support resources.
Expense notifications setup depended on casino account settings not Ukash.
Ukash was accepted at major online gaming sites such as Bet365, 888, William Hill, and PokerStars before closure.
Ukash held select merchant exclusivity contracts during operation, details now historical.
Fees, limits, and bonuses varied by each casino’s policy.
Casinos sometimes offered deposit bonuses for Ukash use; these are now obsolete.
Vouchers supported deposits only; withdrawals were not possible.
Regional restrictions applied according to country gambling laws and operator policies.
Casino operators redeemed Ukash codes through direct API integration for immediate account crediting.
Processing was instant upon entering the voucher code.
Casino fees varied; some charged processing fees, others did not.
Compatibility issues were rare; most leading platforms integrated Ukash without problem during its service period.